Canon EF 55-200 mm f/4.5-5.6 II USM
11. Summary
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pros:
- small picture resolution difference in the center and at the edges of the frame
- very small chromatic aberration at 100 mm and near this focal length
- small vignetting throughout the focal length range
- small coma
- small distortion
- USM motor in this price range lens
- light weight and small size
- reasonable price
- the lens is not completely sharp for f/8 diaphragms
- poor aperture
- visible chromatic aberration at 55 and 200 mm focal length
- for a USM motor-equipped lens, it missed too many times
There are many cheap 70-300 mm lenses on the market with the aperture changing from 4 to 5.6 so. These lenses, at every focal length range, beat the Canon. Here are some examples: Canon’s maximum aperture at the 55 mm focal length and f/4.5 has a diameter of 12.2 mm while a competing 70-300 mm lens set up at 70 mm and f/4 has a diameter of 17.5 mm. For the Canon set up at 200 mm and f/5.6, the aperture is 35.7 mm, while the 70-300 mm models have the same diaphragm value but at 300 mm the aperture is 53.6 mm. Simple mathematics show that the Canon takes in from 2 to 2.5 times less aperture than the 70-300 f/4-5.6. And this would be the only major reason why we might rethink our purchase.