Pentax smc DA 50 mm f/1.8
4. Image resolution
At the maximum relative aperture and by f/2.0 the images are not completely useful but it is hardly a surprise – few 1.8/50 instruments are useful there. In fact the Pentax fares very similarly as its competitors. On stopping down the quality of images improves fast. By f/2.8 the resolution is already on a good level and by f/4.0 it becomes excellent and by f/5.6 – sensational. When it comes to the performance in the frame centre you can boldly say you deal here with a very well-designed system of the 1.8/50 class.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It is worth mentioning one more thing. Our resolution measuring fields are situated not exactly in the frame centre but more than a dozen percent away. In the case of the Pentax it does matter a lot because the resolution of the tested model decreases swiftly as you move away from the geometric middle of the frame. In the very middle the MTFs are noticeably higher than the values shown on our graphs near 30 lpmm.
You can talk about the performance on the edge of the frame in similar terms. Near the maximum relative aperture the images are not especially useful but from f/2.8 onwards they become fully acceptable and from f/4.0 we can call them good with clear conscience.
Traditionally at the end of this chapter we present crops of our testing chart, taken from JPEG files (the lowest sharpening level) saved along RAW files, used for the analysis above.