Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS II USM
11. Summary
- Good quality of lens barrel,
- Very good image quality in frame centre,
- Good image quality on the edge of APS-C sensor,
- Acceptable image quality on the edge of full frame,
- Imperceptible longitudinal chromatic aberration,
- Lack of any serious problems with lateral chromatic aberration,
- Moderate spherical aberration,
- Better distortion correction than in the case of the rivals,
- Better vignetting correction tha in the case of the rivals,
- Good performance against bright light,
- Efficient image stabilization,
- Fast, silent and accurate autofocus.
- A bit too high coma at the shortest focal length,
- Visible distortion at the widest angle of view,
- Significant vignetting on full frame.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In my humble opinion releasing such a lens was an excellent Canon move. They provided a slightly weaker image quality in the frame centre compared to the predecessor and the Sigma A 24–105 mm f/4 DG OS HSM but the difference is often so insignificant that it would be hard to notice it in real life photos. However, we got a lot in return – and I really mean a lot. Firstly, a better image quality on the edges of the frame, lower chromatic and spherical aberration, lower distortion and vignetting plus a very good performance against bright light. As a result you can enjoy a universal lens with a sensible aperture fastness, equipped with a fast, accurate autofocus and an efficient image stabilization unit – a device practically without any serious flaws.