Sony FE 50 mm f/1.8
4. Image resolution
Let’s check how the tested lens compares – its performance in the frame centre, on the edge of the APS-C sensor and on the edge of full frame presents a graph below.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The performance in the frame centre is typical for simple 1.8/50 constructions. Near the maximum relative aperture the results are on a decency level borderline. Still the resolution increases swiftly on stopping down the aperture (so eliminating different optical aberrations), reaching the peak near f/4.0-5.6 and then decreasing due to diffraction. The performance of the Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 STM and the Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.8G was almost identical.
Still when you compare the tested lens to another system device with similar parameters, namely the Zeiss Sonnar T* FE 55 mm f/1.8 ZA, you see more differences. The Zeiss is a more complex construction, ensuring you a better image quality in the f/1.8-2.8 range but it doesn’t go as high by f/4.0 and f/5.6.
For obvious reasons the resolution values of the Sony FE 1.8/50 on the edge of full frame are weaker. If you want to enjoy a completely useful image on the edge of the APS-C sensor you have to close the tested lens down to near f/3.2. On the edge of full frame the same effect can be achieved only by applying f/4.0 or so. These results are practically the same as results of the Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.8G, but a bit lower than the performance of the Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 STM.
One thing is interesting here. Classic 50 mm lenses designed for reflex cameras even out image quality across the frame easier. For example when it comes to the Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 STM and the Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.8 G it would be difficult to find any significant difference between the resolution in the frame centre and the edge of the APS-C sensor. In the case of the Sony FE 50 mm f/1.8 that difference is distinct. Once again it proves that a small distance between optics and a sensor means not only assets but also measurable drawbacks.
At the end of this chapter, traditionally, we present crops taken from photos of our resolution testing chart, saved as JPEG files along RAW files we used for the analysis above.
A7R II, JPEG, f/1.8 |
A7R II, JPEG, f/4.0 |