Sony FE 50 mm f/1.8
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
If you want to own a system lens with similar parameters which performs better in this category you have to get interested in the Sonnar 1.8/55 which coma correction was superior.
Center, f/1.8 | Corner APS-C, f/1.8 | Corner FF, f/1.8 |
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The quite simple optical construction of the lens correct the astigmatism well for a turn. That aberration, understood as an average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 function values, amounted to 4.9% so a level we consider to be low. Within the margin of error, it is the same result as that of the Sonnar 1.8/55 FE and the Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 STM; it also remains noticeably better than the result reached by both Nikkors 1.8/50.
It would be also difficult to complain about out-of-focus areas. Defocused circles of light look nice and the light spread inside seems to be very pleasant. Despite one aspherical element we didn’t notice any traces of onion rings bokeh. A slightly accented rim seems to be the only flaw, and not especially important one. You also should notice a distinct influence of mechanical vignetting.
Center, f/1.8 | Corner APS-C, f/1.8 | Corner FF, f/1.8 |
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Center, f/3.5 | Corner APS-C, f/3.5 | Corner FF, f/3.5 |