Sony FE 40 mm f/2.5 G
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Center, f/3.5 | Corner APS-C, f/3.5 | Corner FF, f/3.5 |
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 function values, amounted to 6.0%. It is a slight value so, once again, you can't find any trace of any negative effects of compromises.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Defocused circles of light look sensibly well. You can notice the effect of using aspherical elements in the construction so onion-ring bokeh structure is easy to spot. Mechanical vignetting is very strong by f/2.5 but, fortunately, it disappears completely on stopping down the aperture by 2 EV.
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Center, f/3.5 | Corner APS-C, f/3.5 | Corner FF, f/3.5 |
Center, f/5.0 | Corner APS-C, f/5.0 | Corner FF, f/5.0 |