Sony FE 40 mm f/2.5 G
8. Vignetting
First let's check vignetting on the smaller APS-C sensor – appropriate thumbnails you can find below.
A7R III, APS-C, f/2.5 | A7R III, APS-C, f/2.8 |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There are some chances to notice slight vignetting only at the maximum relative aperture, where it amounts to 23% (−0.77 EV). By f/2.8 that aberration decreases to 16% (−0.52 EV), and by f/4.0 it drops to an imperceptible value of 8% (−0.26 EV).
After passing to a bigger full frame sensor there are far more problems and photos, presented below, show them very well.
A7R III, FF, f/2.5 | A7R III, FF, f/2.8 |
A7R III, FF, f/4.0 | A7R III, FF, f/5.6 |
In this case you have to take into account a loss of light of 55% (−2.32 EV) at the maximum relative aperture. It's a lot but, to be honest, I expected more. The correction of this aberration is rarely a priority in smallish, moderately fast lenses. It's enough you mention here the performance of the Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/35, with a result of 58%, and the Samyang FE 2.8/35 which could reach 63%. As you see the Sony fares here a tad better.
By f/2.8 vignetting decreases to 49% (−1.92 EV), and by f/4.0 it drops to 38% (−1.40 EV). Further decrease of this aberration is observed by f/5.6 and f/8.0 where we got, respectively, the following results: 32% (−1.12 EV) and 26% (−0.89 EV). By f/11 you see a level of about 20% (−0.67 EV), which, additionally, decreases very slightly to 19% (−0.61 EV) on stopping down the aperture to f/16.
Sony A7R III, JPEG, f/2.5 |