Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ
6. Distortion
Such a solution has its advantages. When you give up correcting one optical aberration you can correct the others far more efficiently. How does the Olympus 12-50 mm fare? Let’s deal with JPEG files first.
At the widest angle even the software didn’t manage to correct the distortion completely. At 12 mm focal length you get noticeable barrel distortion which value we described as –2.25%. When you progress to longer focal lengths the problems disappear. Both in the middle of the focal length range and on its longer end the distortion is by and large zero. Officially the values are 0.02% and 0.11% respectively but, within the margin of error, they are zero.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Raw files are quite another matter. At the widest angle of view we deal with huge barrel amounting to –6.87%. Of course it decreased with the raise of focal length because at 19 mm it is –1.2%. It becomes zero near 26 mm (the official result there being –0.10%) and turns into a slight “pincushion” at longer focal lengths. At the maximum focal length the result gets to 0.97%.
Olympus E-PL1, 12 mm, JPEG | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 26 mm, JPEG | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 50 mm, JPEG | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 12 mm, RAW | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 26 mm, RAW | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 50 mm, RAW | |||