Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
When it comes to the astigmatism similar terms can be used as those describing the coma. It would be difficult to call it invisible because the average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values is 7.7%. On the other hand it would be difficult to complain about it because it is definitely not bothersome. Photos below show defocused images of a diode at 50 mm focal length which was positioned in the frame centre and in its corner. Those images are similar to each other even at the maximum relative aperture - a really praiseworthy performance.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The heterogeneity of light layout in the form of clearly visible concentric rings are to the tested Olympus’s disadvantage though. After a strong stopping down the image of the diode doesn’t look very well because of the small number of diaphragm blades. Nowadays using apertures with 6-7 blades is the minimum standard of decency. The Olympus didn’t reach that minimum though – five blades are definitely not enough.