Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 50-200 mm f/2.8-4 ASPH.
6. Distortion
In the case of Micro 4/3 bodies the distortion correction is helped by the software of a camera. In order to assess how the optics fares without any help you have to analyze RAW files developed by independent software like e.g. dcraw.
In this case the results we got at 50, 100, 150, and 200 mm are, respectively, +0.60%, +0.71%, +0.85%, and +0.88%. At no point we saw results higher than 1.0% so the distortion correction should be described in superlatives only. It should also be added that full frame 100-400 mm lenses can exceed a level of +1.0% without any problems and, you should add, at several focal lengths (see our tests of the Sigma and the Tamron, published not so long ago, or the test of the more expensive Canon 100-400L II which, at the longer end of its focal spectrum, also exceeded that level).
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 50 mm | |||
Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 100 mm | |||
Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 150 mm | |||
Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 200 mm | |||
Olympus E-M5 II, RAW, 50 mm | |||
Olympus E-M5 II, RAW, 100 mm | |||
Olympus E-M5 II, RAW, 150 mm | |||
Olympus E-M5 II, RAW, 200 mm | |||