Samyang AF 24 mm f/2.8 FE
4. Image resolution
Let’s check how the Samyang 2.8/24 FE compares – its results in the frame centre, on the edge of the APS-C sensor and full frame presents a graph below.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In the frame centre at the maximum relative aperture you get a not especially impressive result of almost 43 lpmm; still, you have to admit it reaches a bit above the decency level. With the stopping down the aperture the image quality improves very quickly and by f/5.6 you see a value of almost 58 lpmm, the peak of the performance. It allows you to produce sharp images but we cannot say the lens impressed us in any way. The Tokina, mentioned in our introduction to this chapter, could deliver MTFs by several lpmm higher. Even Samyang have shown they can produce small, lightweight lenses which fared better - it’s enough you mention here the Samyang AF 35 mm f/2.8 FE which could exceed 60 lpmm.
If you combine very small dimensions, a wide angle of view, and a big full frame detector situated close to the rear element of the lens, you are facing very demanding conditions, especially when it comes to image quality on the edge of the frame. We didn’t expect good results in that place and we weren’t surprised that the performance on the edge of the APS-C sensor was only slightly better than the performance on the edge of full frame. In both cases, in a wide area near the maximum relative aperture, the image quality remains weak; in order to improve it you have to employ an aperture of about f/8.0.
To sum up, even though we didn’t expect anything record-breaking we did expect better results that the ones we actually saw. The edge of the frame makes us especially unsatisfied. It seems compromises went a bit too far.
At the end of this part of our test traditionally we present crops taken from photos of our resolution testing chart, saved as JPEG files along RAWs used for the analysis presented above.
A7R II, JPEG, f/2.8 |
A7R II, JPEG, f/5.6 |