Sigma A 50 mm f/1.2 DG DN
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
Center, f/1.2 | Corner APS-C, f/1.2 | Corner FF, f/1.2 |
Center, f/1.8 | Corner APS-C, f/1.8 | Corner FF, f/1.8 |
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values, amounted to just 3.4%. It is an excellent result, once again better than in case of the more expensive rival.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The appearance of out-of-focus images leaves something to be desired. From a lens with such a fast aperture you expect a perfect shape of circles of light and here the high number of aspherical elements makes itself felt in a form of distinct onion-ring bokeh. The precision of Sigma's aspherical elements is apparently inferior to similar elements in the construction of the rival Sony which didn't show such a distinct onion rings in our test.
Limiting dimensions of the Sigma also provided an effect of mechanical vignetting – it makes itself felt even on stopping down the lens by 2 EV. Once again the Sigma is defeated in this area by the Sony.
Center, f/1.2 | Corner APS-C, f/1.2 | Corner FF, f/1.2 |
Center, f/1.8 | Corner APS-C, f/1.8 | Corner FF, f/1.8 |
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |