Canon EF-S 35 mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM
4. Image resolution
Let’s check how the tested Canon compares – its results in the frame centre and on its edge presents a graph below.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
When it comes to the frame centre the results are excellent. Already at the maximum relative aperture the MTFs reach almost 53 lpmm and by f/4.0 they increase to over 54 lpmm. It is a level worth very good system ‘primes’.
The edge of the frame is a bit weaker than the centre but still there are no reasons to complain. At the maximum relative aperture the lens exceeds 40 lpmm, ensuring your images will remain still sharp. On slight stopping down the MTFs are increased to near 44-45 lpmm.
Similar discrepancy between the frame centre and its edge we’ve observed in the case of the Nikkor AF-S DX Micro 40 mm f/2.8G; the one we’ve seen during the test of the Tokina AT-X M35 PRO DX 35 mm f/2.8 was even greater. What’s more, the Tokina’s results on the edge of the frame by f/2.8 were a bit below the decency level. As you see the new Canon compares very favourably with its competitors.
At the end of this part of our test traditionally we present crops from photos of our resolution testing chart saved as JPEG files along RAW files we used for the analysis above.
Canon 50D, JPEG, f/2.8 |
Canon 50D, JPEG, f/4.0 |